US President Donald Trump said Friday morning that he would meet in the “Situation Room” to make a “final decision” after outlining a set of conditions that Iran must accept before he approves an agreement to end the war.
It was not immediately clear from Trump’s statement on Truth Social which of his key demands had already been incorporated into the preliminary agreement currently being negotiated by US and Iranian officials to end the three-month conflict.
Trump demanded that Iran agree never to possess a nuclear weapon and that the Strait of Hormuz be “opened immediately” to shipping traffic without any restrictions or transit fees.
He also stated that the US naval blockade against Iran in the Gulf of Oman “will be lifted now,” although it was unclear whether he meant that this step would occur only if the previous conditions were met.
Trump added that the enriched material buried at sites targeted during last year’s attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities “will be extracted” by the United States “in close coordination and cooperation with the Islamic Republic of Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency,” before being destroyed.
He also said: “No funds will be exchanged until further notice,” adding that “other less important provisions have been agreed upon.”
Trump concluded by saying: “I am now heading to the Situation Room to make the final decision.”
Oil prices fell following Trump’s post.
Disagreements over the agreement’s text
The exact terms of the agreement remain unclear. Later on Friday, Iran’s Fars News Agency responded to Trump’s statement, saying it included issues that “contradict the provisions of the agreement text.”
The agency said in a Telegram post, citing informed sources, that there is no clause in the agreement requiring the strait to remain open without fees.
It also stated that the draft agreement contains no reference to Iran dismantling or destroying its nuclear materials.
Fars emphasized that “the most important part of the agreement” is the “immediate payment of $12 billion in frozen Iranian assets,” adding that Iran will reject any further negotiations unless that payment is made.
The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment regarding Trump’s remarks and the Fars response.
A White House official had confirmed on Thursday an Axios report stating that US and Iranian negotiators had reached a 60-day memorandum of understanding that would extend the current ceasefire and open the door to nuclear talks.
According to the report, the memorandum would also lift restrictions on navigation through the strait and require Iran to remove all mines from the waterway within 30 days in exchange for the United States lifting its blockade.
The issue of Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile and enrichment program would be a top priority during the 60-day period, according to the Axios report. The draft is also expected to pave the way for negotiations on sanctions relief and the release of frozen Iranian funds.
The status of the Strait of Hormuz
Trump’s recent signals suggesting progress toward a US-Iran peace agreement contrast with continued military and economic escalation between the two countries, as well as ongoing anti-American rhetoric from Iranian officials.
The Pentagon announced Thursday morning that Iran had launched a ballistic missile toward Kuwait and deployed attack drones in and around the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian media also reported late Thursday that Iranian armed forces launched missiles toward undisclosed targets.
The US Treasury Department announced new sanctions against Iran on Wednesday and Thursday, including measures targeting Tehran’s recent efforts to assert control over transit traffic through the strait.
In posts on X before Trump’s Friday remarks, Iranian officials appeared defiant toward the United States, praising relations with neighboring Middle Eastern countries, including Oman, which has recently been the subject of Trump’s threats.
According to reports, Oman has been holding discussions with Iran regarding transit fees for ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz, the vital global oil shipping route where traffic has been severely disrupted by Iranian threats since the outbreak of the war.
During a Cabinet meeting on Wednesday, Trump said: “Oman will behave like everyone else, or we’ll have to bomb them.”
On Thursday, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned Oman that the United States would “aggressively target” any party involved in “facilitating the imposition of fees” on passage through the strait.
In a translated post on X attributed to Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Friday morning, a vague but sharply worded description of the negotiations was offered.
The account wrote: “We extract concessions not through dialogue but through missiles; negotiations merely make them understand that.”
It added: “We do not trust guarantees or words. Actions alone are the standard. No step will be taken before the other side moves.”
The statement continued: “The winner of any agreement is the side most prepared for war the next day.”
Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said he had spoken with his Omani counterpart and “reaffirmed Iran’s solidarity with Oman in the face of any threat.”
Bitcoin may be struggling at the moment, but according to Anthony Pompliano, that could simply be part of a much larger market cycle.
Speaking in an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Pompliano explained that many investors are currently chasing artificial intelligence stocks because of their strong momentum and record highs, while Bitcoin has attracted comparatively less attention.
According to Pompliano, markets typically move in cycles, with the assets investors ignore at one stage often becoming the biggest winners later on.
Pompliano said: “What people need to understand is that while AI stocks are surging and everyone is chasing momentum and record prices, the asset you should probably be buying is the one that has fallen out of favor for now but will regain attention later.”
Bitcoin still outperforms over the long term
Pompliano rejected the growing narrative that Bitcoin is a “poor-performing” asset, pointing to its long-term performance record.
He explained that when looking at one-year, two-year, five-year, and even ten-year periods, both Bitcoin and gold have consistently outperformed the S&P 500 in terms of compound annual growth rates.
Although gold is generally viewed as a safer and less volatile asset than Bitcoin, Pompliano argued that both assets have quietly delivered stronger long-term returns than many traditional equities.
At the same time, he acknowledged that recent underperformance has frustrated many investors, particularly as Bitcoin has failed to keep pace with the powerful rally in AI-related stocks over the past two years.
Money printing could become a catalyst for Bitcoin
Pompliano also linked Bitcoin’s future performance to broader macroeconomic conditions, particularly the continued expansion of the US money supply.
He argued that ongoing government spending, liquidity injections, and rising debt levels are likely to renew investor interest in Bitcoin over time.
“The big question is: Will the US government stop printing money? If it doesn’t—and I don’t think it will—then Bitcoin will eventually come back into focus,” Pompliano said.
He added that although Bitcoin has recently lost some appeal compared with high-flying AI stocks, market sentiment can shift quickly once investors begin searching again for alternative stores of value.
Oil prices fell around 2% on Friday and were on track for their largest weekly loss since early April after reports indicated that the United States and Iran had reached a preliminary agreement on a possible extension of the ceasefire.
July Brent crude futures, which expire today, fell by $1.66, or 1.77%, to $92.05 per barrel by 10:59 GMT.
The more actively traded August Brent contract declined by $1.63, or 1.76%, to $91.07 per barrel.
US West Texas Intermediate crude fell by $1.55, or 1.74%, to $87.35 per barrel.
Brent is heading for a weekly loss of around 11%, its largest since the week ending April 6, while US crude is set for a decline of nearly 10%, its biggest weekly loss since the week ending April 13.
Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS, said the market remains focused on the possibility of an agreement between the United States and Iran despite ongoing restrictions on oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz and declining oil inventories.
He added that lower prices could encourage some investors to close long positions.
Sources told Reuters on Thursday that the United States and Iran had reached an agreement to extend the ceasefire and lift restrictions on navigation through the Strait of Hormuz. However, US President Donald Trump has not yet granted final approval, while Iranian state media reported that the agreement has not been formally adopted.
Oil prices have experienced sharp volatility in recent sessions, moving as much as $6 higher and lower amid conflicting signals about the prospects of ending the war with Iran and reopening the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas supplies previously passed.
Despite that, shipping traffic through the strait remains well below pre-conflict levels.
Analysts at ING said reopening the waterway could provide immediate relief to the oil market, but a full recovery in supply remains uncertain.
In Japan, which relies heavily on Middle Eastern oil imports, data showed that crude oil imports fell 66% last month compared with April of last year.
Meanwhile, Commerzbank raised its Brent crude forecast to $90 per barrel by the end of September and $85 per barrel by year-end, based on a scenario that assumes the Strait of Hormuz remains closed to normal shipping activity for another two months.
At the same time, data from the US Energy Information Administration showed declines in crude oil, gasoline, and distillate inventories last week as refinery and consumer demand increased, while US oil exports fell by 1.16 million barrels per day to 4.4 million barrels per day.